Debate is raging over a bold and silly hand that occurred at the Hustler On line Casino live poker night that ended in a big chip swing, a bluff and a participant who couldn't make a selection that they had a damaging hit.
A “Mammoth High Stakes” table on Thursday night had two players in a hand, neither of whom actually had any industry input. Garrett Adelstein and Robbi Jade Lew were sitting on chips of $813K and $133K respectively, and sitting on nice trash palms. Garrett is sitting on 8, 7 suited, Robbi is on jack, 4 off suit – and we’ll let the video do the talking from here. self-perception that Robbi is making an irregular and unconventional play that is downright silly. She doesn’t like to bully and is keeping absolute trash in her hands. Calling a bluff is one ingredient, calling with jack high and being ready where you might also want to rush all-in to call is another.
Come what may, this totally wild play was worth it. Garrett is heartbroken by the overall hand and hits easy hand after easy hand, while Robbi’s beautiful jack keeps coming back – smash for hit hand. In most cases, this type of play would be reserved for enthusiastic poker compilations and “wildest hand of 2022” lists, but this one has taken a ridiculous turn.
Garrett Adelstein had a meltdown that he got over, and naturally his response (spurred by random guys on the internet) ended up being happy that Robbi had cheated on him. He went on a Twitter rant trying to justify why there was no no formula he may have apparently lost his hand – and suggested that Robbi had a vibrating device in her pocket confirming that she was basically keeping her hand more in motion, causing her to stop lifting. SIX SCREENSHOT’s justification that he believes the smoking gun showing Robbi cheated, however, either makes sense or doesn’t make sense and is based predominantly on the idea that “if you don’t see how she cheated on you, you’re not any more elegant”, which is a delightful hominem propaganda attack on those who failed to see the hand as “cheating”.
The point is: The cheating explanation actually makes no sense, even with basically the most generous study. Let's keep Adelstein is correct when he states that Robbi knew his hand, which influenced his decision making. It doesn't change the fact that they were each trash preserving. Sure, Garrett's trash ticket ends up being a little better, but it's still trash. The glowing hand had no effect on the flop, or the increasing discomfort that left Robbi yet at a disadvantage in the general formula. To the river.
It's much more logical that she actually made a really nasty play, rather than taking the piece in an irregular scheme to cheat at a time when there happened to be little support for her to do so. Adelstein presented the kind of adjustment she made to pay off the hand, which poker guys are taking as an act of contrition, despite there being no proof.
I read the person and set up a hero call after he pushes a growth to become a brick card. Drift on that. I'll insist again, I think I've mentioned this before: "I'm not taking good part in the sandbox anymore." Create it right @GmanPoker Or not. #IDGAF
I've already moved on. I'll set it up to lend a hand in any formula.— Robbi Jade Lew (@RobbiJadeLew) September 30, 2022Adelstein claims he popularized the refund because he was so obviously fooled, and sometimes he would never have popularized it, but in this case he did, because he was so clearly fooled. Any other time, no, he was not so obviously fooled—or more so.
Where this starts to get really damaging is the answer after the truth. Poker is a game fat
of silly, illogical plays that actually always pay off, but when they pause, players totally lose. Hell, Jon Bois in Secret Infamous made an ENTIRE VIDEO of illogical poker performances, damaging beats, and examples of players losing when they lost. These performances will also no longer be respected, but are venerated as “brave” and “bold” when a guy does it, but when a girl does it the response is “she cheated.”
The discussion will also be fair, yet it ended there, but Hustler On line Casino Live immediately jumped to Garrett's side, claiming a "thick investigation" in hand the use of fair investigators, fair lawyers, and even suggesting that they may also override a fair request for players to submit to a polygraph.
The idea of starting an investigation over a cheating allegation is long overdue. They’re probably also trying to normalize the story, but it’s a long-standing storyline. The inherent nature of the investigation puts the onus on Robbi to defend himself, all because one person couldn’t type while losing a hand and a bunch of sexist poker guys are participating in “slandering the woman” online.We know this is the case because many players are coming forward claiming that they've played a lot of claps with Robbi, and she plays lickely-split-and-free in events, taking on huge mechanical dangers.I'm in if Rip freerolls me 🙂 She crushed me the one time we played collectively, here are 2 fun hhs…Wsop '21 – 1500 Shootout
(200/400) MP delivers 1k, BU c, SB (Robbi) c, I call BB 57dd(4400) KQTddSB 2k, I call, fold fold(8400) KQTJdd Robbi 2k, I built 5k, she tank calls…— Ben Moon (@bmoon)October 1, 2022
She thought she had J3. She pays ls men are continually looking to rip her and she is waste of life gathering big calls.
She was embarrassed as she actually had J4 and told meaningless lies in an attempt to track down an innocent mistake.If she had become more of a J3, Garrett would have been referred to as 'good hand'.
— Matt Glantz (@MattGlantz) October 2, 2022
— Sam Grafton (@SquidPoker)
September 30, 2022
Is he having an existential meltdown over the reality that she played poker precisely the way it’s supposed to be played, and outplayed him at it? She read his lines, called his bluff, and even gave him a hand with the chips after he threw a tantrum. Even the comment ends up being misogynistic.
https://t.co/2DhzXTVqVD
— ines helene, ShroomGirl (@inihelene) October 3, 2022
So now a participant has to live through silly, trumped up allegations of cheating all because of a man who is generally defined as not losing and ended up being the victim of a scam. That’s all it takes to open a full-scale forensic investigation into the Hustler On line casino Live piece. One would think they would stand by the integrity of their players, especially without a shred of evidence other than a “gut feeling” and a Twitter rant – but they didn’t.
This whole thing is extremely unimaginative, but Robbi had a proposed solution: Let this whole thing be solved, allow her to prove her innocence, then meet in a one-on-one poker match so she can prove her ability as a player.
Adelstein's response ended up being to slam her on Twitter.
Source
English 
Português do Brasil 
Español 